A lot of developers face a situation at a point in their jobs where they will be at a loss of ideas for assessing a product or service’s value. The reason for such is a lack of a standard frame of reference, and this can be quite annoying at times.
Let us consider a non-developmental example. Repairing cars, for instance, is something which is really complex. If no one ever experienced fixing a car with a wrench, being stuck with bills that are pricey or being in charge of financial decisions in complicated and unfamiliar environments then they cannot be blamed.
What could be worse? Owning a business or being the lead for financial decisions whilst delving into uncharted and unfamiliar territory is obviously scary. This can be most often the case when it comes to assessing proposals for app development.
As a matter of fact, creating a digital product is difficult. Hardly anyone knows what to expect between expenses, time and milestones, or which indicators translate to true value. Everyone wants businesses to understand how proposals are evaluated. Now is the time to answer questions related to it.
Understanding Cost Projections in a Proposal for Digital Products
Every professional out there always refers to Google when it comes to looking for answers for costs related to app development. No top notch company would ever post its secrets on the internet and accurate pricing of apps is never determined easily.
Top notch app development companies and experienced app developers launch the minimum viable product (MVP) in around six weeks. They also at times guarantee making an idea successful provided that it is viable. There is a formula in place that can yield the best pricing, but companies then again have to determine that on their own.
Here are the important aspects of app development
- Coding is important.
- Design sprints are executed to plan and test prototypes.
- Market research helps identify target audience.
- User tests are conducted within that audience.
- User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) are designed and developed.
- A road map to launching a great MVP is laid.
- Timely maintenance.
Identifying Red Flags in App Development Proposals
A bad proposal is usually not easy to handle without understanding what to look for. When companies are being interviewed, there are those who have the can do attitude assuring clientele there can be no problem. On the other hand, there are those who employ a much more deliberate approach.
First impressions are necessary, but it would always be wise to have a proof of the development process. Yet, to watch out for red flags, here are some things to keep in mind:
- Beware of proposals that get ready immediately.
- Gaps that do not explain time allocation are shady.
- Pricing projections should be understood for long term support.
Identifying the Good Signs
After identifying the red flags comes identification of the good signs. But it is difficult to assess how good a proposal is.
Professionals from a well-known mobile app development company in Dubai explain that most worthwhile companies will usually project the values and mentality during interviews which are mentioned below along with the content presented in the proposal:
- A holistic approach is used for meeting objectives.
- Good app development companies are MVP viability centric and make strong MVPs as a precursor to a worthwhile app.
- New user testing driven strategies are in place.
- Price and timeline deliver value.
- Proposals answer questions instead of leaving ambiguous gaps.
Mobile App Development Proposals Need Transparency
App development is not a child’s play. It is not like spending six months and the app is yours. Apps are hosted on servers and depending on the user base, servers need to be dispersed geographically. Apart from looking good, they have to be good and truthful so they solve the users’ problems.
These very apps are supported by their proposals. App development proposals lacking transparency are not worth anyone’s time and money. A proposal which is too good to be true will result in monumental financial losses. Then it will also result in a loss of time, which could have been spent at a better company for developing the app and its preceding Minimum viable product (MVP).
App development firms centering themselves on MVP to create the best apps often use a very good approach. This helps pave the way for development of a robust mobile app which can help solve users’ problems through proper problem identification, research, app development, and testing methods.
Conclusion
App development proposals that are too good to be true are never true at all. No app development company can make an app like Uber in just a few months. It takes at least a year or two to get the app made after stringent quality assurance checking, testing and debugging then launch.
